Brodeck: A Novel is a stunning, disturbing, and thoroughly fabulous book. It is beautifully, artistically, and powerfully written -- which I assume means that Mr. Claudel can write like a demon and that his translator, John Cullen, has delivered a performance at the top of his game.
Brodeck is essentially some strange cross between Jerzy Kosinski, The Brothers Grimm, and Franz Kafka. It is a lyrical, introspective, yet foreboding, dark, and ominous. The story is set is some indeterminate yet familiar middle-European country. Brodeck, a resident (for vague reasons) and survivor of a prison/concentration camp during an unnamed war (quite reminiscent perhaps of WWII), returns to his home village and to his wife and child. Not soon after, he is drafted by the town's mayor to write a treatise essentially absolving the village inhabitants of the murder of a mysterious (and wondrous) stranger.
This is a book about the banality of evil, and hatred, and dark, furtive secrets. But is is mostly a powerful and hugely disturbing exploration of what it is like to be the "other", the strange one, the person out of place in society. Brodeck grows up different. Orphaned early (but we really do not know how), he is picked up by a old woman on the road who takes him to another village to live. Brodeck leaves his village to attend the university in the city - and at that university he is out of place, the strange one, not like the others. It is not completely clear what distinguishes Brodeck from his classmates -- it is (as is much in this novel) left unspecified - his he a Gypsy? a Jew? a country bumpkin? Not defined, but definitely different. When war breaks out he is thrown into a concentration camp where he survives by becoming a guard's pet. Literally. Brodeck becomes Brodeck the Dog, moving about on all fours, eating from bowl on the ground. He returns to his village and his job as a writer of reports for some vague government bureaucracy. On day, and stranger arrives in town....the stranger is, well, strange. He talks in a formal florid style, he dresses differently, he takes lodging at the village inn (run by the village mayor, he has apparent wealth and spends it in the village and in entertainments for the villagers. The stranger is polite and friendly. He takes long, solitary walks and is forever writing things down in his book. When he exhibits his drawings, they turn out to be accurate, but unflattering (and more than a little insightful) portraits of the village inhabitants....and he is later murdered. Brodeck is drafted to provide the official, whitewashed version of events.
Brodeck knows about being "the other" and is now writing about his own village's treatment of a different "other". Brodeck "knows how men act when they know they are not alone, when the can melt into a crowd and be absorbed into a mass that encompasses and transcends them, a mass comprising thousands of faces like theirs....the truth is that the crowd itself is a monster...there are no peaceful crowds, either. Even when there's laughter, smiles, music, choruses, behind all that there's blood: vexed, overheated, inflamed blood, stirred and maddened in its own vortex". Words borne from experience, in Brodeck's case. Phenomenal writing in Claudel's case.
Claudel is exploring the world where everyone hates the foreigner, the stranger, the other. Truly, as Claudel sees it, "there are no happy crowds". Brodeck, abandoned as a child, raised by a strange outsider, attending a university as a unique minority, imprisoned and abused for no discernible logic, and living amongst those he knows have their doubts - he knows what it is like to be on the outside and is wrestling with absolving his fellow villagers of the crime of which he knows they are guilty. He really knows..."people are afraid of someone who keeps quiet. Someone who says nothing. Someone who looks and says nothing. If he stays mute, how can we know what he's thinking?" and "but down here, it is best never to be right. That's one thing you always end up paying a very high price for."
Claudel's insight into the hearts and minds is astonishingly good. He knows about ignorance and how it breeds mass hysteria and collective cowardice. Through Brodeck, he observes that "stupidity is a sickness that goes very well with fear. They batten on each other, creating a gangrene that seeks only to propagate itself."
In the end, it is Brodeck's capacity - in the face of everything else - to continue to love that gives us hope. While elucidating the terrible pain that humans visit upon each other, the stupid violence of crowds, the evil visited upon others in the name of hatred, Brodeck can still love.
This is a fabulous novel. Please read it.
The Loss of Two Dear Friends
In the past month, and almost within the same week, I lost two very dear friends. Dick Francis was 89 years old. Robert B. Parker was 76. Between them, they wrote more than 110 books and I have read every one of them except their last (only one of which has just been published) and you can bet that they are on order.
By my loose reckoning, I have spent something like 15 weeks of 40 hour work weeks with Mr. Francis and Mr. Parker, but really it is much more than that. I started reading Dick Francis in college and seeing as though he started writing in 1962, I had a lot of catching up to do. I started reading Robert B. Parker in college as well, but it really started getting interesting when a) I moved to Boston, the location of many of his novels, and b) my girlfriend then fiance then spouse started reading Parker as well. I even received a signed Parker book from my then fiance as a gift. I was thrilled. I have multiple bookshelves devoted to both of these men. Most of my Dick Francis collection, unfortunately now, is in paperback. But we have all the Parker's in hardcover and many are duplicated in paper.
Dick Francis started his career training to be a jockey (he left school at 15) , but WWII interrupted that progression and he became a fighter and bomber pilot for the Royal Air force - piloting Hurricanes and Spitfires. He became a steeplechase jockey upon his return from the war and was a very successful one - named champion jockey in 1953-54. He was the Queen's jockey as well, but had a spectacular failure in "the National" when his horse collapsed just before the finish line. A number of subsequent injuries forced his retirement as a jockey (in the late 60s) and he began writing articles for The Sunday Express of London (something he did for the next 16 years). Racing's loss was my gain. Each of Dick Francis's novels was somehow related to horse racing, but not necessarily as the central theme. In each and every case, Francis did meticulous research to understand and then use specific expertise in his mystery novels. For example, in Bonecrack I learned about antiques and the business of antique dealing, in Shattered, glass blowing, and in Second Wind, meteorology. Mr. Francis wrote a terrific mystery - intriguing, confusing, interesting. Most of the time English racing was the backdrop and I lost myself in his books. Mr. Francis never wrote the same book, each had its own world. Even when he used the same main character (as he did only rarely with Sid Halley and Kit Fielding), the books were all stand-alone.
Robert B. Parker graduated from college and went to war in Korea. When he returned he went back to school and got his Master's in English Literature and worked in advertising for a while. He returned to Boston University and received his Ph.D. with a dissertation titled "The Violent Hero, Wilderness Heritage and Urban Reality", addressed the fictional private-eye heroes created by Dashiell Hammett, Raymond Chandler, and Ross MacDonald. He taught at Northeastern University, became a full professor but turned to full time writing after his first few novels were published. Parker gave us the wise-cracking, good-hearted, but hard-as-nails PI by the name of Spenser, the love of his life Susan Silverman, and his sometimes partner/backup Hawk. He gave us Captain Healy and Lt. Quirk, and Sargent Belson. They were my friends. Even better, my spouse and I read the same books, loved the intimate patter between Spenser and Susan, and occasionally thought (but never spoke) that we had conversations like they did. Parker had other character series -- the ex-big city cop now small town cop with a drinking problem (Jesse Stone), and the daughter of a Boston cop, ex-cop turned private eye with a mobster's son as an ex-husband (Sunny Randall) and a few really good westerns featuring Virgil Cole and Everett Hitch.
Parker had a philosophy that he used in all 60+ novels - there is honor in this world and the good, right people - regardless of what else they may do - worry about that. Those people have a code of conduct and they follow it. Spenser has a code he lives by (and he's a good guy). Hawk, who is decidedly not always a good guy, has a very similar code that guides him and while he may break legs for a living, Spenser can rely on him to to do the right thing. Similarly, Hawk can unconditionally rely on Spenser. Its simplistic, sure. But it helped Robert B. Parker entertain me endlessly.
Parker and Francis provided the literary equivalent of comfort food. When I was stressed, or tired, or uncomfortable, or sick, I would pull out a volume and re-read. I would laugh at the same wisecracks (Parker) or marvel at the mastery of a foreign skill (Francis) and disappear from the world for a few hours (both). I can still do that - in fact, there are two Parker novels and one Francis book on my bedside table right now and I bet neither was written before 1990. It is nice to know that in some ways they will never leave me.
However, there will be (by May of this year) no more new Spenser novels or Jesse Stone, or Sunny Randall stories. No more adventures with Virgil and Everett and I will really miss all of them. I loved it when I found out a new book was out. I will miss that excitement too. Better news for the Francis dynasty -- the last four Dick Francis mysteries were co-written with his son, Felix. While I know it will not be exactly the same, I hope Felix gives it a shot -- it would be a delight to have some new Francis mysteries to keep me company.
For Dick Francis's bibliography, please visit Dick Francis;
For Robert B. Parker's bibliography, please visit Robert B. Parker
Posted at 06:25 PM in Dan's Comments and Rants | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)